Workplace Romance/ Workplace Dating Policy – Yea! Or Nay? Plus: Intel CEO Brian Krzanich's resignation over workplace relationship update
American
Apparel was one company we remember that banned workplace romance. At the time
of this ban many years back the retailer was just about to go defunct (It is
now an online-only retailer and markets itself
as "Ethically Made—Sweatshop Free after filing for bankruptcy and
eventually auctioned). The ban got mixed reactions. Most
considered it lacking logicality and simply draconian but today,
especially with the heightened awareness like the #MeToo movement it might make
a compelling argument whether the ban should become a decree by default and whether that actually makes sense or not. #MeToo makes us
all rethink gender relations in society and in the workplace. We want to
consider all perspectives here. A lot of organisations ban office dating for
many reasons but we ask in that case: What
is the tipping point of how much meddling in an employee's personal affairs the employer should be allowed?
Does the
ban empower the organizations to become overtly authoritative and meddle in
personal affairs of employees in the guise of enforcing corporate cultural
values- thereby triggering serious implications in maintaining a healthy working relationship between colleagues who might have trust issues in building
genuine workplace friendships and support system at work (which are essentially
very important for an employee’s ability to succeed). Also, having a ban might
question the very credibility of being and acting like responsible adults and
the right to one’s privacy turning serious issues of misconduct into a proverbial sword hanging on co-workers’ throats at all times by casting doubt on the validity of reporting a real abuse. As well, blocking in the
creation of safe nurturing environments for employees at the workplace?
Could a decree of this
sort result in diminishing personal conflicts that could also become professional
for instance sexual harassment cases or potentially inappropriate sexual
behaviour at work like how a lot was stirred in a string of revelations by Kate
Upton in her #MeToo post that alleged the Guess co-founder to have been perpetuating
sexual & emotional harassment towards women and the rampant abuse in their
work environment?
Or, could the
workplace ethics get a boost like not allowing room for biased decisions, or
yielding special privileges for the object of one’s affection/love interest at
the workplace? Say for example the case of Lululemon Athletica's Ex-CEO Laurent
Potdevin who had a relationship with an employee while in tenure as the
CEO of the sportswear retailer? A classic case of fraternization in the workplace encompassing relationships that go beyond the normal scope of employee interactions.
Obviously
it’s not always an issue about powerful men alone. Some men get harassed by female co-workers
and that too seldom gets reported. The #MeToo is everyone’s movement regardless
of gender.
Workplace
romances are not uncommon. There is no specific study and research that proves
actual statistics of workplace romances as most of them get noticed but not
reported. However, there are a lot of positives floating around about workplace
romances flourishing in most cases as people work in close proximity to each
other, have plenty of time to know a co-worker better (both laterally and at a
subordinate level), develop a genuine attraction and find a future mate/spouse.
It’s all hunky-dory when two consensual single adults at the workplace find succour
in each other's arms and find love – true, long-term or temporary. The end result
could be a sure shot positive dose of dealing with work-related stress and in
turn greater productivity and harmony all around. However, all hell breaks
loose when a budding work romance turns out to be just a quick fling (“Hell
hath no fury like a woman scorned” – applies to men equally) or it’s a blooming
romance between two married co-workers (not spouses) or worst still a romance, especially
where one person occupies positions of
responsibility and trust. In most cases, office romance went sour
results in a whole lot of collateral damage at the workplace.
Officiating a
decree of sorts to ban workplace romance might not really help minimize that
but it does help establish a protocol and a moral code of conduct at the workplace
for employees at all levels. People spend the majority of their time at work, people are bound to fall in love but a policy doesn't have to be restrictive but should be rather, permissive with riders that employees in a relationship at work with a colleague should avoid any overt displays of affection to ensure that other staff members are not made uncomfortable as a result.
There is
not much of a study on workplace romances as much there is on sexual misconduct
and harassment and there are some definite research and laws in place for the
latter. More important than the
workplace romance ban is the need for organisations to know how to
identify sexual harassment, what behaviours are not acceptable (including how
to change or modify those behaviours and the behaviours of their teams and how
to prevent and respond to any incident especially how to spot it, stop it and
how to prevent a culture where it happens along with the deep understanding of what
behaviours of a particular country constitute sexual harassment and what are
the local compliance laws, or the new Statute to be able to tackle situations as they arise.
Updated on 25th June 2018:
This may sound coincidental but the recent resignation of the Intel CEO, Brian Krzanich due to a "past consensual relationship with an employee" might be illustrative of Intel's workplace dating policy and this post's quest for answers. We are seeing an increasing trend in companies where strict actions are being taken on the workplace dating front on account of violation of the company's policy especially when the superior-subordinate relationship is in question. More at:
Updated on 25th June 2018:
This may sound coincidental but the recent resignation of the Intel CEO, Brian Krzanich due to a "past consensual relationship with an employee" might be illustrative of Intel's workplace dating policy and this post's quest for answers. We are seeing an increasing trend in companies where strict actions are being taken on the workplace dating front on account of violation of the company's policy especially when the superior-subordinate relationship is in question. More at:
Intel now faces a fight for its future
Many
employers permit co-workers to date, spouses to work together but we ask readers
a question - Will a workplace romance ban be a step back or a step forward? It
will be good to research as to what kind of an impact does workplace romances
have over organizational dynamics and whether legislation or a ban will end up
nurturing or discriminating.
ABOUT.COM
The writer, editor @DiverseCustomer - Amit Anand has been
instrumental in setting up diversity programmes, with a specific focus on women. In most cases, he and his advisory panel have created from scratch a comprehensive
programme to support a multi-cultural organisation to achieve its diversity
goals for women and create a legacy of change.
Comments
Post a Comment
Thanks for commenting!